Skip to content
CrCl Calculator

Ideal Body Weight Calculator for CrCl

Cockcroft-Gault does not say which body weight to put in it. That choice is made by convention, and in an obese patient it moves the answer more than any other input on the form. This calculator gives ideal, adjusted and actual body weight together, marks the one conventionally used, and shows the arithmetic that got there.

Ideal body weight calculator

Stays in your browser
Sex
Height unit
Weight unit

Optional — needed for adjusted body weight, BMI and the recommendation

Ideal body weightConventional

73.2 kg

Adjusted body weight

73.9 kg

Actual body weight

75.0 kg

BMI: 23.7 kg/m²

Actual weight is 102% of ideal body weight and BMI is 23.7 kg/m², so ideal body weight is conventionally used.

Weight-basis selection is a dosing convention, not a validated equation. Institutional protocol and a drug’s prescribing information override it.

Updates as you type · no submit

  • No patient data stored
  • Free · no signup
  • Pending clinical review

Which body weight should you use to calculate CrCl?

Use ideal body weight for most patients, adjusted body weight when the patient is obese, and actual body weight when it falls below ideal. Ideal body weight comes from the Devine formula and adjusted body weight from Bauer. These are dosing conventions rather than validated equations — the original Cockcroft-Gault paper used actual weight — so institutional protocol overrides them.

Why it matters

Why does the weight you choose change the dose?

Cockcroft-Gault multiplies by body weight because weight stands in for muscle mass, and muscle mass is what produces creatinine. Adipose tissue produces very little. So in a patient carrying a large amount of fat, feeding actual weight into the equation credits them with muscle they do not have and overestimates clearance — which, for a renally cleared drug with a narrow margin, means a dose that is too high.

Ideal body weight corrects that by estimating what the patient would weigh at a healthy build for their height. Adjusted body weight sits between the two, on the reasoning that fat tissue is not metabolically inert and contributes something. Which one applies is a decision, and this page exists to make that decision visible rather than silent.

The formulas

What are the Devine and Bauer formulas?

Both are simple arithmetic and both are reproduced here exactly as published, so you can check this calculator against them rather than trust it.

Ideal body weight — Devine (1974)
Male:   IBW (kg) = 50.0 + 2.3 × (height in inches − 60)
Female: IBW (kg) = 45.5 + 2.3 × (height in inches − 60)
Height is converted to inches first. Note what this means: ideal body weight depends only on height and sex. Two patients of the same height and sex have the same ideal body weight whatever they actually weigh.

Source: Devine BJ. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1974;8:650–5.

Adjusted body weight — Bauer (1983)
AdjBW (kg) = IBW + 0.4 × (actual weight − IBW)

0.4 = proportion of weight above ideal that is counted
The 0.4 factor is the proportion of excess weight over ideal that is counted. It is the value conventionally paired with Cockcroft-Gault for renal dosing; other factors appear in the literature for other purposes.

Source: Bauer LA et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983;33(4):519–25.

Choosing

Which basis applies, and when

The thresholds below are the conventional ones. They are not from a trial, and they are not a rule you are obliged to follow — they describe what most renal dosing references do. The calculator marks the conventional choice and still shows you all three.

Decision tree for choosing the body weight used in Cockcroft-GaultIs actual weightbelow ideal?yesActual body weightnoBMI ≥ 30 kg/m², or> 120% of ideal?yesAdjusted weightnoIdeal body weight
Weight-basis selection is sequential, not parallel. A patient below their ideal body weight takes actual weight regardless of BMI — that test comes first, and it is the one most often skipped.
Conventional weight-basis selection for Cockcroft-Gault
SituationWeight usedWhy
Actual weight below ideal
< IBW
Actual body weightUsing ideal body weight here would credit the patient with muscle they do not have and overestimate clearance.
Normal build
≤ 120% of IBW and BMI < 30
Ideal body weightThe conventional default, and the basis most renal dosing references assume unless they say otherwise.
Obese by BMI
≥ 30 kg/m²
Adjusted body weightActual weight would substantially overestimate clearance; ideal weight alone would ignore the real metabolic contribution of the excess tissue.
Well above ideal without meeting the BMI cut-off
> 120% of IBW
Adjusted body weightA muscular or large-framed patient can exceed ideal weight considerably without a BMI in the obese range; the adjustment still applies.
Selection is a convention rather than a validated equation, and it is not a substitute for your institution’s protocol. Where a drug’s prescribing information names a weight basis, that basis wins. See the special populations calculator for amputation, paediatrics and the obesity-specific Salazar-Corcoran equation.

Worked examples

What changes between three patients of the same height?

Every figure below is computed by the same code that runs the calculator above, so if one changes the other changes with it.

Normal build

Male, 178 cm, 75 kg

Sex
Male
Height
178 cm
Actual weight
75 kg
178 cm = 70.1 inches
IBW = 50.0 + 2.3 × (70.1 − 60)
    = 50.0 + 2.3 × 10.1  =  73.2 kg

BMI = 75 / 1.78²  =  23.7 kg/m²
Actual 75 kg = 102% of IBW → ideal body weight

73.2kg

Actual weight is close to ideal, so the conventional choice is ideal body weight and the two answers barely differ.

Obese

Male, 178 cm, 130 kg

Sex
Male
Height
178 cm
Actual weight
130 kg
178 cm = 70.1 inches
IBW = 73.2 kg  (as above — height and sex only)

BMI = 130 / 1.78²  =  41.0 kg/m²   → obese
AdjBW = 73.2 + 0.4 × (130 − 73.2)
      = 73.2 + 22.7  =  95.9 kg

95.9kg

Here the choice matters most. Actual weight would nearly double the clearance estimate against ideal weight — the single largest source of error in a Cockcroft-Gault result.

Underweight

Female, 160 cm, 44 kg

Sex
Female
Height
160 cm
Actual weight
44 kg
160 cm = 63.0 inches
IBW = 45.5 + 2.3 × (63.0 − 60)
    = 45.5 + 6.9  =  52.4 kg

Actual 44 kg is below IBW 52.4 kg
→ actual body weight is used

44.0kg

Actual weight is below ideal, so ideal body weight is not used. Applying it anyway would overestimate clearance in exactly the patient least able to tolerate an overdose.

Limitations

What these formulas cannot do

Devine was never derived from a study of body composition. It was written in 1974 as a rule of thumb for dosing, and it has been used far beyond that ever since. Knowing where it stops being reasonable matters more than the arithmetic.

It extrapolates below 5 feet

The formula subtracts a fixed amount per inch under 60, so a short patient gets an ideal weight that keeps falling in a straight line. The calculator flags a result as extrapolated rather than presenting it as though the formula were validated there.

It says nothing about body composition

A bodybuilder and a sedentary patient of the same height and sex get the same ideal body weight. Muscle mass is what actually drives creatinine production, and height is a poor proxy for it at the extremes.

It was not designed for children

Devine assumes an adult frame and should not be applied to paediatric patients. Use the bedside Schwartz equation instead.

Amputation invalidates the height relationship

Ideal body weight is derived from height, and an amputation removes mass without changing height. The special populations calculator applies the limb-segment correction.

Questions

Ideal body weight and CrCl

The questions that come up most often when choosing a weight basis. Every answer states its source.

How do you calculate ideal body weight?

Devine (1974): ideal body weight in kg = 50.0 for men or 45.5 for women, plus 2.3 kg for every inch of height above 60. Height is converted to inches first. Ideal body weight therefore depends only on height and sex — two patients of the same height and sex have the same ideal body weight whatever they actually weigh.

Which body weight should you use for Cockcroft-Gault?

Ideal body weight for most patients, adjusted body weight when the patient is obese, and actual body weight when actual falls below ideal. This is a dosing convention rather than a validated equation — the original 1976 Cockcroft-Gault paper used actual weight — so institutional protocol and a drug’s prescribing information override it.

What is adjusted body weight and when is it used?

Adjusted body weight = ideal body weight + 0.4 × (actual weight − ideal body weight), from Bauer et al. (1983). It is conventionally used when BMI is 30 kg/m² or above, or when actual weight exceeds 120% of ideal. It sits between actual and ideal because adipose tissue produces some creatinine, but far less per kilogram than muscle.

Why not just use actual body weight in obese patients?

Cockcroft-Gault multiplies by weight because weight stands in for muscle mass, and muscle is what produces creatinine. Adipose tissue produces very little, so actual weight credits an obese patient with muscle they do not have and overestimates clearance — which for a renally cleared drug with a narrow margin means a dose that is too high.

Is the Devine formula accurate for patients under 5 feet?

No. Below 60 inches the formula keeps subtracting 2.3 kg per inch in a straight line, well outside the range it was written for, and can return implausibly low values. Treat the result as an estimate, check it against institutional guidance, and note that Devine was never derived from a study of body composition — it was published in 1974 as a dosing rule of thumb.

Security & privacy

Nothing you enter leaves this page

All calculations run entirely in your browser. No patient values are transmitted, logged or stored.

No server round-trip

The equations run as JavaScript on your device. There is no API endpoint that accepts a clinical value, because the calculation code never makes a network request.

Nothing is persisted

Values are not written to a database, a log, local storage or a cookie. Closing the tab discards them.

No account, ever

No signup, no email capture, no paywall. Every calculator works fully without identifying yourself.

One analytics script, and it never sees your values

Google Analytics counts page views. It runs outside the calculator, receives nothing you type, and has ad personalisation switched off. No advertising network, no embedded widgets, no remote fonts.

This is a property of how the site is built, not a policy that could quietly change. Read the full privacy policy or the terms and medical disclaimer.

Get in touch

Corrections, contributions and enquiries

Clinical corrections take priority over everything else on this site. If an equation, threshold or caveat here is wrong, we want to hear about it.

Report a clinical error

Tell us the page, what is incorrect, and a source if you have one. Please do not include any patient information.

Email a correctionMore ways to reach us →

Write for us

We publish guest guides from pharmacists, prescribers, nurses and clinical educators — with a real byline and a link back to your work.

See the guidelinesRead the existing guides →

Development & marketing

This site is built and maintained by Gem Programmers. If you need a calculator, a technical-SEO build or a content programme of your own, talk to us.

Message on WhatsAppAbout Ali Raza

Now calculate the clearance

The main CrCl calculator applies all three weight bases at once and marks the conventional choice, so you never have to copy a number between pages.

Medical disclaimer: This calculator is intended for healthcare professional reference and educational purposes only. It does not replace clinical judgment or the advice of a licensed provider. Always verify dosing decisions against institutional protocol and current prescribing information.